Performance evaluation of the IEEE 802.15.4 MAC for low-rate low-power wireless networks
By Gang Lu, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, Cauligi S. Raghavendra. IEEE International Conference on Performance, Computing, and Communications, 2004, 2004
368 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da172b6af1dd1892ce420196fc1634e94e773082
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Andreas Willig
- Sinem Coleri Ergen
- Adam Wolisz
- Kirsten Matheus
- Kin Kwong Leung
- Francky Catthoor
- Abdelmalik Bachir
- Thomas Watteyne
Citations in the corpus
- Handbook of Sensor Networks: Algorithms and Architectures (2005, background): “Information such as where, when, and how often data are physically collected and delivered, can be leveraged to significantly reduce the overall power consumption in the sensor network [61].”
- Wireless Technology in Industrial Networks (2005, background): “Under the conditions investigated in [96], the maximum user data rate when running in the 2.4-GHz ISM band is 38 kb/s with one source, and up to 70 kbs when multiple sources are present.”
- Performance Analysis of Slotted Carrier Sense IEEE 802.15.4 Medium Access Layer (2008, methodology): “The performance of the IEEE 802.15.4 protocol has been evaluated by simulation for small and low load networks in [ 5 ] and for dense networks in [6].”
- Recent and Emerging Topics in Wireless Industrial Communications: A Selection (2008, background): “Although a number performance assessments have already been conducted (some examples are [100], [101], [102]), to the best of our knowledge there are not many publications available (one example is [103]) that study the achievable industrial-QoS performance as defined in Section II-A of these protoc”
- MAC Essentials for Wireless Sensor Networks (2010, background): “The authors of [90] have quantified the tradeoff in energy consumption and data rate for both tracking methods and found that whilst the tracking approach is almost independent of the data rate, the non-tracking mode almost linearly depends on the rate.”