Determination of soil–water characteristic curve variables
By Q. Zhai, H. Rahardjo. 2012
147 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9e04b2b6b06bfd08c2d604a9da4049ead59a855
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Quantification of uncertainties in soil-water characteristic curve associated with fitting parameters (2013, methodology): “…¼ ψb amax; nmax; mminð Þ; AEVmin ¼ ψb amin; nmin; mmaxð Þ; ð15Þ ψrmax ¼ ψr amax; nmin; mminð Þ;ψrmin ¼ ψr amin; nmax; mmaxð Þ; ð16Þ Where: ψb(a, n, m) and ψr(a, n, m) are the function for the determination of air-entry value and residual suction (Zhai and Rahardjo, 2012), respectively.”
- Effects of residual suction and residual water content on the estimation of permeability function (2017, background): “Zhai and Rahardjo (2012a) demonstrated the geometrical relationship between these SWCC variables as illustrated in Figure 2.”
- Estimation of air permeability function from soil-water characteristic curve (2015, methodology): “…(2) where: Cr = input value, can be a roughly estimated value for residual suction, Cr = 1500 kPa for most cases as suggested by Fredlund and Xing (1994) and Zhai and Rahardjo (2012a, 2012b); θ = volumetric water content; ψ = matric suction; e = Euler’s number and a, n and m = fitting…”