Predator selection of prairie landscape features and its relation to duck nest success

By M. L. Phillips, W. Clark, M. Sovada, D. J. Horn, R. Koford, R. Greenwood. 2003

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9cd80d7da79dd625d3db9b613a1cd604ab94d71

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. J. Taylor
2. Dana L. Thomas
3. Stephanie A. Tucker
4. F. Schmiegelow
5. W. Clark
6. T. E. Gosselink
7. N. Koper
8. Clay L. Pierce

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. E. J. Taylor
2. Dana L. Thomas
3. F. Schmiegelow
4. W. Clark
5. N. Koper
6. M. Boyce

Citations in the corpus

• Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Resource Use and Availability II (2006, background): “Authors using compositional analysis often noted that temporally correlated relocation data was acceptable (e.g., Gosselink et al. 2003, Phillips et al. 2003) citing Aebischer et al. (1993).”
• Space Use and Habitat Selection by Bobcats in the Fragmented Landscape of South-Central Iowa (2008, methodology): “For both the MANOVA and t-tests, we weighted the logratios by the square root of the number of locations for each animal (Phillips et al. 2003).”
• A multi-scaled analysis of avian response to habitat amount and fragmentation in the Canadian dry mixed-grass prairie (2006, background): “Both ducks and songbirds may be sensitive to grassland amount and fragmentation (Austin et al. 2001; Bakker et al. 2002; Phillips et al. 2003).”