Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control.
By H. Weir, M. Thun, B. Hankey, L. Ries, H. Howe, P. Wingo, A. Jemal, Elizabeth E. Ward, Robert N. Anderson, B. Edwards. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2003
935 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9bcf1123403450fd2943ac51b282cda45bdc22f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Epidemiology
In Oncology
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower. (2005, background): “In 2001, approximately 75% of men in the United States aged 50 years and older reported that they had previously undergone PSA screening and 54% have reported regular PSA screening.(1,2) Prostate cancer screening with PSA has been controversial, as no studies have proven that this strategy reduces m”
- IL-6 and STAT3 are required for survival of intestinal epithelial cells and development of colitis associated cancer (2009, background): “Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common fatal malignancies worldwide (Weir et al., 2003).”
- The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality (2004, background): “From 1992 to 2000, breast cancer death rates among white women declined in 38 US states, whereas among blacks increases were observed in several states [32].”
- Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival (2004, neutral): “As was discussed in last year’s Annual Report to the Nation, the prevalence of mammography and cervical and colorectal cancer screening at recommended intervals also varies across the states.(6) Marked variation among states was noted in the percentage of unstaged cases for all four cancers.”
- Cancer Statistics, 2004 (2004, methodology): “7% more deaths were classified as cancer using ICD-10 rules than using ICD-9 rules,(14) creating discontinuity in the most recent cancer mortality rate trend.(15,16) Delay-adjusted cancer incidence rates stabilized in men from 1995 to 2000 and increased by 0.”