Interfacial thermal resistance between carbon nanotubes: Molecular dynamics simulations and analytical thermal modeling

368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Recently emerging trends in thermal conductivity of polymer nanocomposites (2016, background): “Other parameters include functions of nanoparticles/polymer, nanofiller-nanofiller interfacial interaction (Zhong and Lukes 2006, Fujigaya et al.”
High thermal conductivities of carbon nanotube films and micro-fibres and their dependence on morphology (2017, background): “According to [22] [63] [14] [32], the longer the nanotubes, the steeper the temperature gradient of the thermal conductivity, and nanotubes that are sufficiently longer than the phonon mean free path are less sensitive to bending [25], as low-frequency phonons do not appear to be scattered by kinks.”
Thermal conduction phenomena in carbon nanotubes and related nanostructured materials (2013, background): “Using MD simulations, Zhong and Lukes (2006) found that the thermal contact resistance between parallel (10,10) SWCNTs on the order of 10 7 m2 KW 1, while Maruyama et al. (2004) predicted a slightly smaller value of 6:48 10 8 m2 KW 1 for parallel (5,5) SWCNTs. Zhong and Lukes (2006) predicted that…”
Surfactant-free dispersion of silver nanoparticles into MWCNT-aqueous nanofluids prepared by one-step technique and their thermal characteristics (2013, background): “[43] H.”