The Science and Values of Restoration Ecology

By Mark A. Davis, L. Slobodkin. 2004

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9730ddad130e7fc6cda23e1856c276e19c75b8d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Ecological Restoration and Physiology: An Overdue Integration (2008, background): “…have outlined future directions and opportunities for restoration ecology (Allen 2003, Ormerod 2003, Young et al. 2005), emphasizing the need to adopt a more scientific approach to restoration relative to what was once regarded as an “art” (Van Diggelen et al. 2001, Davis and Slobodkin 2004).”
Recommendations for Integrating Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology in Ponderosa Pine Forests of the Southwestern United States (2006, background): “The publication of Restoration & Management Notes (now called Ecological Restoration) starting in 1981, the founding of SERI in 1987, and the inauguration of Restoration Ecology in 1993 have established the field of restoration ecology as a science (Davis & Slobodkin 2004).”
Science, Uncertainty, and Values in Ecological Restoration: A Case Study in Structured Decision‐Making and Adaptive Management (2013, background): “This article contributes to an active debate, unfolding over the past decade, concerning the relative roles of scientific and values-based inputs in defining and implementing restoration projects (Davis & Slobodkin 2003; Winterhalder et al. 2004).”
New wilderness in the Netherlands: an investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes (2006, background): “The Dutch nature development policy can be understood as part of an international movement that has set forth ecological restoration as the new standard in nature management practice (Hobbs and Norton, 1996; Davis and Slobodkin, 2004 ).”
Habitat Restoration—Do We Know What We’re Doing? (2007, background): “Fortunately, ecologists are beginning to recognize the key role that social values play in determining the outcomes of restoration (Davis & Slobodkin 2004; Hobbs et al. 2004).”
Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning (2006, background): “Establishment of conservation reserves that support high levels of biodiversity and associated ecological processes over the long-term requires not only information on species richness but also complementary measures of ecological integrity (Karr, 1981; Smogor and Angermeier, 2001; Davis and Slobodk”
Framework for understanding marine ecosystem health (2013, background): “This does not mean that ecological knowledge should only be used instrumentally, to guide actions decided by political processes (Lackey 2001, Davis & Slobodkin 2004).”