Superodinate goals versus superordinate identity as bases of intergroup cooperation.

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model (2006, unknown): “Brewer (2001) defined social identification as a representation of ‘. . .the extent to which the in-group has been incorporated into the sense of self, and at the same time, that the self is experienced as an integral part of the in-group’ (p. 121).”
Vicarious Shame and Guilt (2005, methodology): “Drawing upon group theory and research (e.g. Brewer, 2000; Hamilton, Sherman, & Lickel, 1998; Krech & Crutchfield, 1948; Lewin, 1948; Prentice, Miller, & Lightdale, 1994; Rabbie & Horwitz, 1988; Tönnies, 1998; Wilder & Simon, 1998), we highlight two dimensions of social associations that might play…”
National Identity and Self-Esteem (2003, background): “106 Brewer 2000.”
Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted? (2005, background): “1 Evidence consistent with an evolutionary theory of political behavior is found in Brewer 2000, Hibbing and Alford 2004, and Orbell et al. 2004. the world and over the decades is difficult for behavioralists to explain.”