Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis.
By A. Serpa Neto, S. O. Cardoso, J. A. Manetta, V. G. M. Pereira, D. C. Espósito, Manoela de Oliveira Prado Pasqualucci, Maria Cecília Toledo Damasceno, M. Schultz. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2012
802 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d923045a08b5692c40a634e3aa4d15c1e17cd8df
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Emergency Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines 2021: Post-resuscitation care. (2021, background): “protective ventilation strategy is the standard of care, especially in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [9, 90, 91].”
- Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. (2013, neutral): “USA/Canada 1,455 (28) 1,341 (27) 929 (11) Latin America 1,222 (24) 1,306 (26) 1,692 (21) Africa 119 (2) 110 (2) 167 (2) Asia 0 78 (2) 1,242 (15) Oceania 0 0 714 (9) Age, mean (SD), yr 59 (17) 59 (17) 61 (17) ,0.”