Eye-tracking and Individual Differences in off-Normal Event Detection when Flying with a Synthetic Vision System Display

By L. Thomas, C. Wickens. 2004

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d91a710819b58ffb4149d71390d0dea82fe7e335

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. G. Ziv
2. Raja Parasuraman
3. Thomas B. Sheridan
4. C. Wickens

In Social Psychology

1. Raja Parasuraman
2. C. Wickens
3. Thomas B. Sheridan
4. G. Ziv
5. Mica R. Endsley
6. Dietrich Manzey
7. M. Staal
8. Katja Kircher

Citations in the corpus

• Gaze Behavior and Visual Attention: A Review of Eye Tracking Studies in Aviation (2016, methodology): “For example, in one study (Thomas & Wickens, 2004), pilots flew simulated landing approach scenarios with an SVIS that either included or did not include a three-dimensional tunnel to fly through.”
• Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs (2008, background): “Note the last statement, in which they mentioned “diversion of attention to the flight director versus other sources of data.” This is the precise finding from the empirical studies of complacency described earlier! Studies using eye movements and other information-sampling techniques do in fact poi”