Intralocus sexual conflict.

By R. Bonduriansky, S. Chenoweth. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2009

782 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Contemporary Evolution of Fitness (2018, background): “…which can generate intralocus sexual conflict (cross-sex genetic correlation for fitness of less than one) and shape the overall magnitude of genetic variance in fitness and associated responses to selection (Brommer et al. 2007, Kruuk et al. 2008, Bonduriansky & Chenoweth 2009, Kirkpatrick 2009).”
Constraints Evolve: Context Dependency of Gene Effects Allows Evolution of Pleiotropy (2015, background): “This is often referred to as intralocus conflict (Bonduriansky & Chenoweth 2009).”
Comprehending crystalline β-carotene accumulation by comparing engineered cell models and the natural carotenoid-rich system of citrus (2011, neutral): “Because between-sex genetic correlations constrain the independent evolution of female and male traits, a negative relationship has been predicted between the extent of sexual dimorphism and rMF (Slatkin, 1984; Reeve and Fairbairn, 2001; Bonduriansky and Chenoweth, 2009).”