A Combined Local and Nonlocal Closure Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Part I: Model Description and Testing
By J. Pleim. 2007
973 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8f9d4fd257cf8313d6f9c8fe6b7c9440074e87b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- H. Shin
- Song‐You Hong
- Jimy Dudhia
- Joseph B. Klemp
- William C. Skamarock
- Wei Wang
- D. Barker
- Michael G. Duda
In Environmental Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Verification of Convection-Allowing WRF Model Forecasts of the Planetary Boundary Layer Using Sounding Observations (2013, methodology): “This result suggests that the use of local mixing under more stable regimes in the ACM2 scheme (Pleim 2007) consistently produces more accurate nocturnal PBL depths than the YSU scheme.”
- Representation of the Subgrid-Scale Turbulent Transport in Convective Boundary Layers at Gray-Zone Resolutions (2015, background): “The conventional nonlocal PBL parameterizations express the nonlocal transport through a mass-flux term (e.g., Pleim 2007; Siebesma et al. 2007; Pergaud et al. 2009) or a gradient-adjustment gamma term (e.g., Troen and Mahrt 1986; Holtslag and Boville 1993; Hong et al. 2006).”
- Intercomparison of Planetary Boundary-Layer Parametrizations in the WRF Model for a Single Day from CASES-99 (2011, methodology): “In the ACM2 scheme, the method is similar to that of the YSU scheme; h is diagnosed as the height above the level of neutral buoyancy where the bulk Richardson number for the entrainment layer exceeds the critical value (Pleim 2007b).”
- Seasonal variation of local atmospheric circulations and boundary layer structure in the Beijing‐Tianjin‐Hebei region and implications for air quality (2015, methodology): “…four commonly used BL schemes (i.e., the Yonsei University (YSU) [Hong et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2013], Mellor-Yamada-Janjic (MYJ) [Janjić, 1994], Bougeault-Lacarrere (Boulac) [Bougeault and Lacarr ere, 1989], and Asymmetric Convective Model, version 2 (ACM2) [Pleim, 2007] schemes) were tested.”
- Impact of aerosol–meteorology interactions on fine particle pollution during China’s severe haze episode in January 2013 (2014, methodology): “…(Kain 2004), the Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 for the PBL (Pleim 2007a, 2007b), the RRTMG radiation mechanism and the Pleim–Xiu land-surface model (Pleim and Xiu 1995 and Xiu and Pleim 2001) with indirect soil moisture and temperature nudging (Pleim and Xiu 2003, Pleim and Gilliam 2009).”
- A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 (2008, methodology): “The ACM2 (Pleim, 2007) is a combination of the ACM, which is a simple transilient model that was originally a modification of the Blackadar convective model, and an eddy diffusion model.”
- A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Model Version 4 (2019, methodology): “88 8.6.4 Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi-Niino (MYNN) Levels 2.5 and 3 . . . . . . . . 88 8.6.5 Asymmetrical Convective Model version 2 (ACM2) PBL . . . . . . . . . 89 8.6.6 Bougeault-Lacarrere PBL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .”