A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment

By Janne O. Y. Chung, Gary Monroe. 2001

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, General Decision Sciences, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8da65cb7256d6d263c5783bc7d6e60b9bfa49ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Joël Branson
2. S. Cahan
3. Diane Breesch
4. Kris Hardies
5. Jerry Sun
6. E. Hengel

In General Decision Sciences

1. S. Cahan
2. Jerry Sun
3. E. Hengel

In Marketing

1. S. Cahan
2. E. Hengel

Citations in the corpus

• Do (Fe)Male Auditors Impair Audit Quality? Evidence from Going-Concern Opinions (2016, background): “A small number of behavioural accounting studies confirm that such sex differences are indeed able to impact audit judgements (e.g. Chung & Monroe, 2001; Gold, Hunton, & Gomaa, 2009).”
• The Effect of Audit Experience on Audit Fees and Audit Quality (2015, background): “Chung and Monroe (2001) find that women auditors outperform male auditor in an inventory valuation task.”
• Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. (2017, background): “(Unrewarded) Higher quality 2 Female students earn better grades (Voyer and Voyer, 2014).2 Female auditors are more accurate and efficient (Chung and Monroe, 2001; O’Donnell and Johnson, 2001; Niskanen et al., 2011; Ittonen et al., 2013).2 Congresswomen secure more federal funding for their…”