How can China reach its CO2 intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development
By Wenfang Yi, L. Zou, Jie Guo, Kai Wang, Yi-Ming Wei. 2011
244 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8d56c79b490f183d705cedec8a30bcd3e974563
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Environmental Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- A comparison of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission trends among provinces in China (2017, background): “potential of various regions is still worthy of discussion ([9]).”
- Energy technology patents–CO2 emissions nexus: An empirical analysis from China (2012, background): “The economic development levels are different in China’s provinces and municipalities, and it has direct impact on the development of energy technology and amount of carbon emissions (Wei and Yang, 2010; Yu and Qi, 2007).”
- Quantifying regional economic impacts of CO2 intensity targets in China (2012, background): “Many researchers have studied how various metrics can be used to inform the allocation of the provincial targets to achieve efficiency or equity goals (Meng et al., 2011; Ohshita et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012; Wei et al., 2011; Yi et al., 2011), but the actual targets are the result of political n”
- Regional allocation of carbon emission quotas in China: Evidence from the Shapley value method (2014, background): “It should be noted that this paper adopts the entropy method to allocate carbon quotas among regions in China and the results are consistent with the results by Yi et al. (2011) and Yu et al.”
- How can China achieve its Intended Nationally Determined Contributions by 2030? A multi-criteria allocation of China’s carbon emission allowance (2019, background): “Thus, in search of implementable allocation schemes for CEA, additional allocation principles such as efficiency, feasibility and sustainability have been increasingly adopted beyond the equity principle [26,17,16].”