Measuring Pro-Poor Growth in Non-Income Dimensions

By M. Grosse, Kenneth Harttgen, Stephan Klasen. 2008

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8d4f0383c7aa255adbf124fe4bdf81d7c2c436f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. Stephan Klasen
2. Hyun H. Son
3. N. Kakwani
4. S. Knowles
5. S. Seguino
6. N. Kabeer
7. Luisa Natali
8. Isis Gaddis

In Social Psychology

1. Stephan Klasen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Stephan Klasen
2. N. Kakwani
3. Hyun H. Son
4. S. Knowles
5. S. Seguino
6. Isis Gaddis
7. Dina N. Abu-Ghaida

Citations in the corpus

• Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate (2008, background): “On the other hand, Grosse et al. (2008) have defined pro-poor growth in a stronger absolute sense: growth is pro-poor if the poor enjoy greater absolute benefits than the non-poor.”
• Measuring and Monitoring Inclusive Growth: Multiple Definitions, Open Questions, and Some Constructive Proposals (2010, background): “Ali and Son’s (2007) concept of inclusive growth aligns closely to the non-income growth incidence curves proposed by Klasen (2008) and Grosse et al. (2008), where growth incidence curves are drawn for improvements of non-income dimensions of well-being such as education or health.”