Connectivity Conservation: Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature
By K. Crooks, M. Sanjayan. 2006
267 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8cbaeefe2f772a095b88706090dbb330286f9f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Marie-Josée Fortin
- Santiago Saura
- Niko Balkenhol
- L. Santini
- C. Rondinini
- J. Brashares
- Sarah C. Sawyer
- C. Epps
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The pond network: can structural connectivity reflect on (amphibian) biodiversity patterns? (2011, background): “Landscape connectivity definitions abound in landscape ecology literature (Crooks and Sanjayan 2006), but this complex concept is still surrounded by uncertainty and confusion (Tischendorf and Fahrig 2000).”
- Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least‐cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? (2011, background): “Efforts to mitigate the impacts of habitat fragmentation by preventing or reversing population isolation are encompassed within the growing field of connectivity conservation (Crooks & Sanjayan 2006).”
- Graph models of habitat mosaics. (2009, background): “…Letters (2009) 12: 260–273 I N T R O D U C T I O N Ecology and conservation biology are much invested in habitat connectivity and its implications for populations (Tischendorf & Fahrig 2000; Fahrig 2003; Calabrese & Fagan 2004; Chetkiewicz et al. 2006; Crooks & Sanjayan 2006; Beier et al. 2008).”
- Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis (2010, background): “…temporally dynamic, it is therefore important to understand how landscape features affect animal species’ abilities to move in order to meet requirements for daily foraging, migration, dispersal, or other movement-dependent processes (Taylor et al. 1993; With et al. 1997; Crooks & Sanjayan 2006).”
- Ecological connectivity research in urban areas (2015, background): “However, studies that directly and quantitatively investigated these attributes were usually conducted across non-urban landscapes where the influence of roads and habitat fragmentation receive considerable, and deserved, attention (Crooks & Sanjayan 2006a).”
- Connectivity of the global network of protected areas (2016, background): “It is, however, generally acknowledged that the benefits of restoring connectivity outweigh the risks (Crooks & Sanjayan, 2006) and that the current connectivity levels are well below those that created and are needed to maintain the current diversity of species in our planet.”
- Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States (2012, background): “…conservation scientists believe that maintaining or restoring landscape connectivity is critical to conserving global biodiversity (Bennett 2003; Crooks & Sanjayan 2006; Hilty et al. 2006; Worboys et al. 2010) and is the most common strategy recommended for ecological adaptation to climate…”