Near-infrared imaging and the K—z relation for radio galaxies in the 7C Redshift Survey

By C. Willott, S. Rawlings, M. Jarvis, K. Blundell. 2002

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present K-band imaging of all 49 radio galaxies in the 7C-I and 7C-II regions of the 7C Redshift Survey (7CRS). The low-frequency (151-MHz) selected 7CRS sample contains all sources with flux densities S 1 5 1 > 0.5 Jyin three regions of the sky. We combine the K-band magnitudes of the 7CRS radio galaxies with those from the 3CRR, 6CE and 6C* samples to investigate the nature of the relationship between K-magnitude and redshift and whether there is any dependence upon radio luminosity. We find that radio galaxies appear to belong to a homogeneous population that formed the bulk of their stars at high redshifts (z f > 5) and evolved passively from then until they reach a mean present-day luminosity of 3 L * . We find a significant difference between the K-magnitudes of the 7CRS and 3CRR radio galaxies with the 7CRS galaxies being 0.55 mag fainter at all redshifts. The cause of this weak correlation between stellar and radio luminosities probably lies in mutual correlations of these properties with the central black hole mass. We compare the evolution-corrected host luminosities at a constant radio luminosity and find that the typical host luminosity (mass) increases by approximately 1 L * from z ∼ 2 to ∼0.5 which, although a much smaller factor than predicted by semi-analytic models of galaxy formation, is in line with results on optically selected quasars. Our study has therefore revealed that the small dispersion in stellar luminosity of radio galaxies around 3 L * includes subtle but significant differences between the host galaxies of extreme- and moderate-power radio sources at fixed redshift, and between hose of high- and low-redshift radio sources at fixed radio luminosity.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8b0fa4ab24eda75b7718089a02d1280d8d60871

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. I. Smail
  4. J. Dunlop
  5. R. Ivison
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. P. Best
  8. S. Chapman

Citations in the corpus