Three-Dimensional Orientation Microscopy in a Focused Ion Beam–Scanning Electron Microscope: A New Dimension of Microstructure Characterization

By S. Zaefferer, S. Wright, Dierk Raabe. 2008

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In the present work, we report our recent progress in the development, optimization, and application of a technique for the three-dimensional (3-D) high-resolution characterization of crystalline microstructures. The technique is based on automated serial sectioning using a focused ion beam (FIB) and characterization of the sections by orientation microscopy based on electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) in a combined FIB–scanning electron microscope (SEM). On our system, consisting of a Zeiss–Crossbeam FIB-SEM and an EDAX-TSL EBSD system, the technique currently reaches a spatial resolution of 100 × 100 × 100 nm3 as a standard, but a resolution of 50 × 50 × 50 nm3 seems to be a realistic optimum. The maximum observable volume is on the order of 50 × 50 × 50 μm3. The technique extends all the powerful features of two-dimensional (2-D) EBSD-based orientation microscopy into the third dimension of space. This allows new parameters of the microstructure to be obtained—for example, the full crystallographic characterization of all kinds of interfaces, including the morphology and the crystallographic indices of the interface planes. The technique is illustrated by four examples, including the characterization of pearlite colonies in a carbon steel, of twins in pseudonanocrystalline NiCo thin films, the description of deformation patterns formed under nanoindents in copper single crystals, and the characterization of fatigue cracks in an aluminum alloy. In view of these examples, we discuss the possibilities and limits of the technique. Furthermore, we give an extensive overview of parallel developments of 3-D orientation microscopy (with a focus on the EBSD-based techniques) in other groups.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Structural Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8910f132172bc77d8b5a342ef4b91465c9a9784

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. H. Fabritius
2. Philip Eisenlohr
3. Dierk Raabe
4. Duancheng Ma
5. Franz Roters

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Franz Roters
2. M. Diehl
3. Philip Eisenlohr
4. Dierk Raabe
5. J. Markmann
6. Celal Soyarslan
7. Duancheng Ma
8. Swantje Bargmann

In Structural Biology

1. Dierk Raabe
2. Franz Roters

Citations in the corpus

• Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials: A review (2018, background): “, when trying to precisely capture cementite lamellae in EBSD scans [95] which complicates the reconstruction process.”
• DAMASK – The Düsseldorf Advanced Material Simulation Kit for modeling multi-physics crystal plasticity, thermal, and damage phenomena from the single crystal up to the component scale (2018, methodology): “The applied serial sectioning approach consists of multiple cycles of mechanical polishing and EBSD imaging [33,267].”