Energy and reserve pricing in security and network-constrained electricity markets

By J. M. Arroyo, Francisco D. Galiana. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2005

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d88ff0ddc8b2cc0c9db32207f913ba7494d2f86f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Stochastic security for operations planning with significant wind power generation (2008, result): “This approach is similar to the security-constrained scheduling problem formulated in [34].”
Market-clearing with stochastic security-part II: case studies (2005, background): “We refer the reader to [7] for a proof.”
Towards Full Integration of Demand-Side Resources in Joint Forward Energy/Reserve Electricity Markets (2012, background): “In the context of the current paper, the formulation of the price of energy at node and period as per [17], is”
Pricing Electricity in Pools With Wind Producers (2012, background): “As opposed to [15], we price energy through the pool prices, and deployed reserve through the balancing prices.”
Market-clearing with stochastic security-part I: formulation (2005, background): “Note that this approach constitutes a departure from current practice, but as justified in [16], this generalization is necessary when transmission congestion is present and when the marketclearing solution considers the expected cost of deploying postcontingency actions, as we propose in this paper”
Contingency-Constrained Reserve Requirements in Joint Energy and Ancillary Services Auction (2009, background): “A simultaneous energy and ancillary services market clearing model with transmission constraints was proposed in [15]–[17].”
Scheduling and Pricing of Coupled Energy and Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Reserves (2005, methodology): “Following the mathematical argument based on the application of those infinitesimal perturbations to the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker optimality conditions put forward in [27], we obtain the following infinitesimal increment in the scheduling cost”
Stochastic Multiobjective Market Clearing of Joint Energy and Reserves Auctions Ensuring Power System Security (2009, unknown): “Their work includes unit commitment with dc load flow representation of the network, in which they implemented energy and security pricing scheme, suggested recently by Arroyo and Galiana [9].”
A Review of Power System Flexibility With High Penetration of Renewables (2019, background): “Therefore, charging separate prices for up and down reserve at the same node has little meaning [52], [77].”
Umbrella contingencies in security-constrained optimal power flow (2005, background): “Moreover, it does not optimize the associated loss of welfare due to reserve deployment following the occurrence of any credible contingency [19].”