Designs for Evaluating Local and Regional Scale Trends

By D. P. Larsen, T. Kincaid, S. Jacobs, N. S. Urquhart. 2001

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Biological Assessment and Criteria Improve Total Maximum Daily Load Decision Making (2004, background): “JOURNA estimates of status without the need to intensively monitor all waters (Larsen et al. 2001).”
Non‐parametric small area estimation using penalized spline regression (2008, methodology): “We refer to Messer et al. (1991) and Larsen et al. (2001) for a description of the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program and the north-eastern lakes survey.”
Nonparametric small area estimation using penalized spline regression (2005, unknown): “We refer to Messer, Linthurst, and Overton (1991) and Larsen et al. (2001) for a description of the EMAP program and the Northeastern Lakes survey.”
Effective monitoring of freshwater fish (2019, background): “The adaptive approach (Larsen et al., 2001) argues that the sampling design should be re-evaluated and re-designed as necessary as data are gathered and their variability analysed (Box 1).”
Smoothing parameter selection methods for nonparametric regression with spatially correlated errors (2005, methodology): “We refer to Larsen et al. (2001) for a more detailed description of the survey design.”