Co-consumption¹ and protective coating¹: two new proposed effects of epiphytes on their macroalgal hosts in mesograzer-epiphyte-host interactions

By R. Karez, Silke Engelbert, Ulrich Sommer. 2000

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Decreased depth distribution of Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyceae) in the Western Baltic: effects of light deficiency and epibionts on growth and photosynthesis (2008, unknown): “The consequences for the fouled organism may be manifold (Wahl, 1989) and may be beneficial (e.g. associational defence, camouflage) or detrimental (e.g. weight increase, shading, competition for nutrients, co-consumption sensu Karez et al., 2000).”
Effects of epiphyte load on optical properties and photosynthetic potential of the seagrasses Thalassia testudinum Banks ex König and Zostera marina L. (2003, background): “1981) or repelling potential leaf grazers (Karez et al. 2000).”
Trophic importance of Laminaria hyperborea to kelp forest consumers and the importance of bacterial degradation to food quality (2003, background): “Such studies, along with multiple-choice feeding experiments (Pavia et al. 1999, Karez et al. 2000), reflect idealised situations.”