Genomes and What to Make of Them

By B. Barnes, J. Dupré. 2008

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8676051cb5ee10eab8bfac67883f6812f92b633

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. Daniel J. Nicholson
2. Maurizio Meloni
3. J. Dupré

Citations in the corpus

• Everything Flows : Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology (2018, background): “This has led to growing doubts about the ontological significance of genes as discrete components of genomes, which in turn has prompted a more direct focus on the genome itself (Barnes and Dupré 2008).”
• How Biology Became Social, and What it Means for Social Theory (2014, background): “In sum, the more genetic research has gone forward, the more genomes are seen to ‘respond in a flexible manner to signals from a massive regulatory architecture that is, increasingly, the real focus of research in “genetics” ’ (Griffiths and Stotz, 2013; see also Barnes and Dupré, 2008).”
• A Manifesto for a Processual Philosophy of Biology (2018, background): “This has led to growing doubts about the ontological significance of genes as discrete components of genomes, which in turn has prompted a more direct focus on the genome itself (Barnes and Dupré 2008).”