Deep learning for digital pathology image analysis: A comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases

By Andrew Janowczyk, Anant Madabhushi. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2016

1,296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background: Deep learning (DL) is a representation learning approach ideally suited for image analysis challenges in digital pathology (DP). The variety of image analysis tasks in the context of DP includes detection and counting (e.g., mitotic events), segmentation (e.g., nuclei), and tissue classification (e.g., cancerous vs. non-cancerous). Unfortunately, issues with slide preparation, variations in staining and scanning across sites, and vendor platforms, as well as biological variance, such as the presentation of different grades of disease, make these image analysis tasks particularly challenging. Traditional approaches, wherein domain-specific cues are manually identified and developed into task-specific "handcrafted" features, can require extensive tuning to accommodate these variances. However, DL takes a more domain agnostic approach combining both feature discovery and implementation to maximally discriminate between the classes of interest. While DL approaches have performed well in a few DP related image analysis tasks, such as detection and tissue classification, the currently available open source tools and tutorials do not provide guidance on challenges such as (a) selecting appropriate magnification, (b) managing errors in annotations in the training (or learning) dataset, and (c) identifying a suitable training set containing information rich exemplars. These foundational concepts, which are needed to successfully translate the DL paradigm to DP tasks, are non-trivial for (i) DL experts with minimal digital histology experience, and (ii) DP and image processing experts with minimal DL experience, to derive on their own, thus meriting a dedicated tutorial. Aims: This paper investigates these concepts through seven unique DP tasks as use cases to elucidate techniques needed to produce comparable, and in many cases, superior to results from the state-of-the-art hand-crafted feature-based classification approaches. Results : Specifically, in this tutorial on DL for DP image analysis, we show how an open source framework (Caffe), with a singular network architecture, can be used to address: (a) nuclei segmentation (F-score of 0.83 across 12,000 nuclei), (b) epithelium segmentation (F-score of 0.84 across 1735 regions), (c) tubule segmentation (F-score of 0.83 from 795 tubules), (d) lymphocyte detection (F-score of 0.90 across 3064 lymphocytes), (e) mitosis detection (F-score of 0.53 across 550 mitotic events), (f) invasive ductal carcinoma detection (F-score of 0.7648 on 50 k testing patches), and (g) lymphoma classification (classification accuracy of 0.97 across 374 images). Conclusion: This paper represents the largest comprehensive study of DL approaches in DP to date, with over 1200 DP images used during evaluation. The supplemental online material that accompanies this paper consists of step-by-step instructions for the usage of the supplied source code, trained models, and input data.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Biophysics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d847ee63fe234f9cc2a8be851ed511b7d1a8da36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Yoshua Bengio
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Lorenzo Torresani
  5. Quoc V. Le
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Trevor Darrell
  8. Jianfeng Gao

In Biophysics

  1. Mattias Rantalainen
  2. Johan Hartman
  3. Balazs Acs
  4. Lubomir M. Hadjiiski
  5. Atsuto Maki
  6. Maciej A. Mazurowski
  7. Heang-Ping Chan
  8. Mateusz Buda

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Andrew Zisserman
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  5. Trevor Darrell
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Jitendra Malik
  8. Bernt Schiele

Citations in the corpus