The Determination of Weeds of National Significance
By J. Thorp. 2006
253 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8337ce5fe9e527e09e3d7b61e910cdec89729a0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. M. Reid
- P. Downey
- L. Morin
- J. Virtue
- R. Hiebert
- Samaneh Solhjouy-fard
- J. Randall
- Lalit Kumar
Citations in the corpus
- Does invasive plant management aid the restoration of natural ecosystems (2009, background): “We focused our study on the 20 Australian ‘Weeds of National Significance’ (Thorp and Lynch, 2000)”
- Invasive weed species’ threats to global biodiversity: Future scenarios of changes in the number of invasive species in a changing climate (2020, background): “Thirty-two IWS, as listed in Table 1, were selected from IWS literature, based on their i) importance, ii) potential for spread, iii) environmental, social, and economic impacts, and iv) ability to be successfully managed via the protocol documented in The Determination of Weeds of National Signific”
- The Invasive Species Assessment Protocol: A Tool for Creating Regional and National Lists of Invasive Nonnative Plants That Negatively Impact Biodiversity (2008, background): “For example, the Australian system (Thorp and Lynch 2000) is designed to include both agricultural and environmental weeds.”