Gang Membership and Adherence to the “Code of the Street”

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Going to extremes: Social identity and communication processes associated with gang membership (2014, background): “, Brown & Horowitz, 1993), youth are not likely to buy into the guilting or violent victimization approaches because (a) they are more likely to care about what their peers think than worry about the welfare of the greater community (Matsuda et al., 2012), (b) the social rewards they garner from the”
What Do We Know About Gangs and Gang Members and Where Do We Go From Here? (2013, background): “…of low self-control, and Laub and Sampson’s (2003) life-course theory of informal social control, these too have been applied to and tested in the gang context with varying degrees of success (e.g. Kissner & Pyrooz, 2009; Matsuda et al., 2012; Melde & Esbensen, 2012; Thornberry et al., 2003).”
Taking Stock of the Relationship Between Gang Membership and Offending (2016, background): “The work of Melde and colleagues (Matsuda et al., 2013; Melde & Esbensen, 2011, 2014), as well as others (e.”
The psychology of change: self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. (2014, background): “…. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334 The Pervasive Psychology of Self-Defense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335 Self-Affirmation Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .”