Local Clusters, Innovation Systems and Sustained Competitiveness
By L. Mytelka, Fulvia Farinelli. 2000
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d82d1657950303a8c7f083e68aef7fef98d5f4b7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bruno Silvestre
- Sylvia Schwaag-Serger
- J. Sörvik
- E. Wise
- P. R. T. Dalcol
- J. Cassiolato
- H. Lastres
- Thomas Andersson
Citations in the corpus
- The Cluster Policies Whitebook (2004, methodology): “● UN cluster development approaches: UNIDO (Humphrey and Schmitz, 1995; Nadvi 1995; Ceglie and Dini 1999; Ceglie 2003); UNCTAD (UNCTAD, 1994 and 1998); and UNU (Mytelka and Farinelli, 2000) applied in reviews of individual countries.”
- Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration—Brazil (2009, background): “…and Hall (2007) argue that clusters must be recognized as an industry-specific idiosyncratic subgroup of a regional innovation system that achieves constructed advantages through evolutionary and path dependent innovation, while Mytelka and Farinelli (2000) not all clusters are innovation systems.”
- Systems of Innovation and Development (2003, background): “As particularly emphasized by Mytelka and Farinelli, 2003, the innovation system approach breaks ranks with the traditional view of innovation as a process of radical change at the frontier of an industry; and recognizes that innovation extends beyond formal research and development (R&D).”