Biofuel, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania

By E. Sulle, F. Nelson. 2009

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d82c17597e1065dd83d9847f3369e949383c1d1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals (2012, background): “2010) and smaller private companies, investing in crops such as Jatropha (Sulle and Nelson 2009 ).”
Contemporary processes of large-scale land acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa: legal deficiency or elite capture of the rule of law? (2013, background): “These findings are supported by other studies pointing to insufficient compensation (Cleaver, Schram, & Wanga, 2010; Habib-Mintz, 2010; Mkindi, 2008; Sulle & Nelson, 2009).”
Over the heads of local people: consultation, consent, and recompense in large-scale land deals for biofuels projects in Africa (2010, background): “A somewhat more hands-on role is played by Tanzania’s investment promotion agency, the Tanzania Investment Centre (TIC).”
Land grabbing in Southern Africa: the many faces of the investor rush (2011, background): “Mounting evidence shows that leases or concessions have been granted on communal land that is already claimed, occupied and used by local people (Cotula et al. 2009, Sulle and Nelson 2009; World Bank 2010).”
The international political economy of the global land rush: A critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers (2012, background): “…aspects, carried out by, among others, the World Bank (Deininger et al. 2011), the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) (Sulle and Nelson 2009, Nhantumbo and Salomão 2010), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) (Görgen et al. 2009), the…”
Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? (2011, background): “This was reportedly the case in Tanzania where compensation (some $10/ha) paid by an outside investor was much less than the $35/ha estimated to be the value of the annual harvest of nontraditional forest products (Sulle and Nelson 2009).”
Reconciling food security and bioenergy: priorities for action (2017, background): “In Malawi and Tanzania, contracting with smallholders was found to effectively improve household incomes and community welfare (Sulle & Nelson, 2009; Hermann & Grote, 2015).”