The Economic Consequences of Disappearing Government Debt

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Unconventional Monetary Policies: An Appraisal (2009, unknown): “Clouse et al. (2000) and Reinhart and Sack (2000), for instance, provide evidence that even sizeable changes in the composition of the public’s asset holdings would have only small effects on yields.”
Sovereign Risk, Fiscal Policy, and Macroeconomic Stability (2013, background): “…to rise 10For a systematic empirical analysis of the relationship between fiscal variables and yields on government bonds, see, among others, Reinhart and Sack (2000), Ardagna et al. (2007), Baldacci et al. (2008), Haugh et al. (2009), Laubach (2009), Baldacci and Kumar (2010), or Borgy et…”
Conducting Monetary Policy at Very Low Short-Term Interest Rates (2004, background): “The limited empirical evidence suggests that, within broad classes, assets are close substitutes, so that changes in relative supplies of the scale observed in U.S. experience are unlikely to have a major impact on risk premiums or term premiums (Reinhart and Brian Sack, 2000).”
Fiscal Discipline and the Cost of Public Debt Service: Some Estimates for OECD Countries (2007, unknown): “…(2004), Hoelscher (1986), Laubach (2003), Miller and Russek (1991) and (1996), Orr et al. (1995), Paesani et al. (2006), Perotti (2002), Plosser (1987), Reinhart and Sack (2000), and Tavares and Valkanov (2001). in a broad panel of 16 OECD countries covering a maximum time span from 1960 to 2002.”