An Examination of the Credence Attributes of an Audit

By Monika Causholli, W. Robert Knechel. 2012

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7f659781a29126b1f22aa9a7e8e0dfbeb20bded

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. W. Robert Knechel
2. Mikhail Pevzner
3. S. Cahan
4. Uma Velury
5. Lori B. Shefchik
6. Jerry Sun
7. Gopal V. Krishnan
8. Tobias Svanström

In Management Information Systems

1. Gopal V. Krishnan
2. Mikhail Pevzner
3. Lori B. Shefchik
4. Uma Velury
5. W. Robert Knechel

Citations in the corpus

• Audit Markets, Fees and Production: Towards an Integrated View of Empirical Audit Research (2011, unknown): “This issue may be related to the risk of under-auditing discussed by Causholli and Knechel [2011]. Furthermore, the trend in most countries is towards more regulation to protect investors and financial markets.”
• The Effect of Audit Experience on Audit Fees and Audit Quality (2015, background): “Auditing is a credence good because the client cannot determine the amount of service required ex ante and because the client cannot determine the quality of the service ex post (e.g., Causholli & Knechel, 2012; Emons, 1997).”
• Audit Quality: Insights from the Academic Literature (2013, background): “See Causholli and Knechel (2012a) for a more complete explanation of the distinction between experience and credence goods.”