Cross-impact balances: A system-theoretical approach to cross-impact analysis

By Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle. 2006

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7e2f448b1664982291bb4fdea48d1f56ca8aeaa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Yongtae Park
2. Eunchan Lee
3. M. Hulme
4. Juneseuk Shin

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Yongtae Park
2. Eunchan Lee
3. M. Hulme
4. Bastien Girod
5. Juneseuk Shin
6. S. Dessai
7. M. Höök
8. Xu Tang

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Yongtae Park
2. Eunchan Lee
3. M. Hulme
4. Bastien Girod
5. Juneseuk Shin

Citations in the corpus

• The evolution of the IPCC's emissions scenarios (2009, background): “…inadequate description and allocation of the scenarios (especially the sustainability credentials of SRES B1 and B2), and (ii) ignoring literature which provided improved approaches for storyline and scenario construction (cf. Godet, 2000; Swart et al., 2004; Wiek et al., 2006; Weimer-Jehle, 2006).”
• Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief network (2009, methodology): “However, the cross impact analysis method has the disadvantages of demanding the experts’ estimation of conditional probabilities or joint probabilities of event pairs, or the marginal probability of events (Weimer-Jehle, 2006).”