Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment

By Metin Dagdeviren, Serkan Yavuz, Nevzat Kılınç. Expert systems with applications, 2009

827 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7e27971ac96e1dd7f28d243c6f282274d78255f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Citations in the corpus

Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea (2011, methodology): “Weights for the criteria may be obtained by using the entropy method (Huang, 2008) or by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method (Dağdeviren et al., 2009) or based on subjective weights and objective weights (Wang & Lee, 2009).”
Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review (2015, neutral): “…2008 Kwong and Bai [155] 2002 Kwong and Bai [156] 2003 Chen and Tzeng [157] 2004 Cheng et al. [158] 1999 Bozdag et al. [159] 2003 Dagdeviren et al. [100] 2009 Chan et al. [160] 2008 Fuzzy AHP papers using other generalizations and extensions of fuzzy sets have also been published in the literature.”
A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Gear Motor Company (2013, neutral): “Although there are many applications of F-AHP in various fields including; personnel selection [38], weapon selection [39], energy alternatives selection [40], job selection [41] and performance evaluation systems [42], [43] only the recent Fuzzy AHP applications for supplier selection problems will”
Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company (2014, background): “…the literature it is proved that TFN is an effective way of formulating decision problems containing subjective and imprecise information (Torlak, Sevkli, Sanal, & Zaim, 2011; Deviren et al., 2009; Chang & Yeh, 2002; Chang, Chung, & Wang, 2007; Kahraman, Bes_kese, & Ruan, 2004; Zimmerman, 1996).”