Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: does one model fit all?

By Martin A. Nuñez, Aníbal Pauchard. Biological Invasions, 2010

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7c5c7a8454682d52341ac24705f4c8e6c578e9d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Insect Science

Citations in the corpus

Revealing the scale of marine bioinvasions in developing regions: a South African re-assessment (2011, background): “The situation is of even greater concern in regions of the world where the state of knowledge of the marine biota remains relatively poor, or where there has been less historical interest in invasions (Nuñez and Pauchard 2010), as a result of several confounding reasons.”
An inventory of invasive alien species in China (2012, background): “…et al. 2010), and national/regional data sets suitable for analysis of temporal patterns of biological invasions are rare for developing countries of the world, resulting a pattern that reflects geographical biases in information on invasion patterns (Pyšek et al. 2008; Nuñez and Pauchard 2010).”
Current mismatch between research and conservation efforts: The need to study co-occurring invasive plant species (2013, background): “Because this database collects information on projects from developing and developed nations, there may be inherent biases stemming from organizational and managerial differences between cultures (Nuñez and Pauchard, 2010).”
Plant Invasions in Protected Areas (2013, background): “Options for managing invasive species in PAs are limited in developing countries by two important factors: limited funding and expertise, and the need to balance the needs of biodiversity with those of local communities (Nuñez and Pauchard 2010).”
Ecology and management of invasive Pinaceae around the world: progress and challenges (2017, background): “It has been suggested that different countries or regions may need different solutions (Nuñez and Pauchard 2010; Pauchard et al. 2010).”
When does invasive species removal lead to ecological recovery? Implications for management success (2018, background): “However, invasive primary producers, herbivores, and omnivores also have substantial impacts on communities and ecosystems (Nunez and Pauchard 2010; Strayer 2010; Bobeldyk and Lamberti 2010; Vila et al. 2011).”
Raising the flag on marine alien fouling species (2017, background): “The need to monitor for alien species is well recognised but managers are often faced with limited resources to undertake these actions (Hewitt and Martin 2001; Arenas et al. 2006; Campbell et al. 2007), especially in developing countries (Nuñez and Pauchard 2010).”
Non-native species and invasion biology in a megadiverse country: scientometric analysis and ecological interactions in Brazil (2016, background): “This demonstrates the need to develop control policies for the transport and trade of non-native species within Brazil and across countries (e.g. Fonseca et al. 2013), since invasive species do not recognize borders (Nuñez and Pauchard 2010).”
The elephant in the room: the role of failed invasions in understanding invasion biology (2013, background): “We lack formal explanations for these biases; although they can be partially explained by unequal introduction effort and history of attention to species’ introductions (Nuñez and Pauchard 2010).”