Turbulent Dispersed Multiphase Flow

By S. Balachandar, John K. Eaton. 2010

1,767 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7c4eb49dd59aba71cb4b286a9e58715c19ddc31

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Computational Mechanics

In Ocean Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Bubble puzzles: From fundamentals to applications (2018, methodology): “Encouraged by these successes, we [175, 176] dared to transfer Maxey and Riley’s seminal idea of using effective forces on small particles to describe their (collective) dynamics in dispersed multiphase flow with point-like particles [173] to turbulent dispersed multiphase flow [177–179] with point-”
Analyzing preferential concentration and clustering of inertial particles in turbulence (2012, background): “…as USt = n0St (with St the usual Stokes number and n0 the average number of particles in a dissipative eddy) which they have shown to give a better collapse of experimental data on turbulence modulation (see also the reviews by Poelma and Ooms, 2006; Balachandar and Eaton, 2010 on this question).”
Anisotropic Particles in Turbulence (2017, methodology): “…DNS is able to solve for all scales of motion, down to the smallest, it has been particularly valuable to the study of turbulent dispersed flows, in which the limiting case of small spherical particles has received extensive attention (Elghobashi & Prosperetti 2009, Balachandar & Eaton 2010).”
On multiphase turbulence models for collisional fluid–particle flows (2014, background): “…flows are most often discussed in the dilute-particle limit where the fluid-phase turbulence interacts with inertial particles (see, e.g., Balachandar & Eaton 2010), thereby creating particle-phase velocity and number density fluctuations that can, in principle, be referred to as…”
Bubbly and Buoyant Particle–Laden Turbulent Flows (2020, background): “Balachandar and Eaton (2010) presented the most recent review discussing important aspects of turbulent bubbly flows.”
On fluid–particle dynamics in fully developed cluster-induced turbulence (2015, background): “In the literature, turbulent particle-laden flows are most often discussed in the dilute limit where the fluid-phase turbulence interacts with inertial particles without significant feedback from the particles (see e.g. Balachandar & Eaton 2010, and references therein).”
Pairwise interaction extended point-particle model for a random array of monodisperse spheres (2017, methodology): “Expressions for these contributions have been rigorously obtained by Gatignol (1983) and Maxey & Riley (1983) in the Stokes regime, with empirical corrections that extend their applicability to finite Reynolds numbers (Magnaudet & Eames 2000; Balachandar & Eaton 2010; Crowe et al. 2011).”
Turbulent channel flow of dense suspensions of neutrally buoyant spheres (2014, background): “Few decades later, Batchelor (1970) and Batchelor & Green (1972) derived and proposed a quadratic correction that partially accounts for the mutual interactions among particles, which become more and more critical when increasing the volume fraction.”
Experimental investigation on interactions among fluid and rod-like particles in a turbulent pipe jet by means of particle image velocimetry (2014, background): “This topic has been the subject of several works (Parthasarathy and Faeth 1990; Kussin and Sommerfeld 2002; Paris and Eaton 2001 among others), and a comprehensive review is given in Balachandar and Eaton (2010). Gore and Crowe (1989) proposed a single parameter to characterize the dispersed phase e”
Multiscale simulation of atomization with small droplets represented by a Lagrangian point-particle model (2014, methodology): “The Lagrangian point-particle approach has been widely used in turbulent dispersed multiphase flows [5, 6].”