a comprehensive
By Gillian M Heinecke, Sebastian G. Bernardo, Cindy L. Tsui, Jacob Levitt. 2013
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Zheda Mai
- Ruiwen Li
- Abhishek Niroula
- Hyunwoo J. Kim
- Scott Sanner
- Jihwan Jeong
- David Quispe
- Xiaofan Zhou
Citations in the corpus
- Online Continual Learning in Image Classification: An Empirical Survey (2021, methodology): “[28] introduces a tuning protocol for two tasks (D1 and D2).”
- Large language models for generative information extraction: a survey (2023, unknown): “…various IE techniques, specialized frameworks designed for a single subtask, and universal frameworks capable of addressing multiple subtasks simultaneously. gently needs a more in-depth analysis of how LLM can be more appropriately applied to IE tasks to improve the performance of the IE field.”
- Variation Interpretation Predictors: Principles, Types, Performance, and Choice (2016, methodology): “Tools in this domain include KD4i [Bermejo-Das-Neves et al., 2014] and SIFT Indel [Hu and Ng, 2013] that predict theimpactofnonframeshiftinginsertionsanddeletions.”
- Evaluating Fast Maximum Likelihood-Based Phylogenetic Programs Using Empirical Phylogenomic Data Sets (2017, background): “PrumD6, 200 taxa and 259 genes [Prum et al. 2015]), large numbers of genes (e.”