Distribution patterns in butterflies and birds of the Czech Republic: separating effects of habitat and geographical position

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From communities to continents: beta diversity of herbivorous insects (2005, background): “2001), on latitudinal and longitudinal gradients in species richness (Storch et al. 2003), as well as regional species lists for comparison with local communities.”
Power‐law species–area relationships and self‐similar species distributions within finite areas (2004, background): “The difference was 0.26 ± 0.19 for BD and 0.09 ± 0.19 for pBD. Figure A1 The first three stages of the construction of a random self-similar distribution, which was used for the testing the hypothesis that the spatial distribution of birds within the Czech Republic (CR) and central Europe (CE) can b”
Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche‐based models (2006, methodology): “Patterns of species’ distributions may be spatially autocorrelated because of contagious population dynamics and historical factors, but they may also be the result of spatial structure among environmental predictors ( Storch et al. 2003 ).”
Accounting for multi‐scale spatial autocorrelation improves performance of invasive species distribution modelling (iSDM) (2012, background): “While the origins and scales of spatial dependence in biogeographical observations are manifold, two types of factors are commonly recognized: (1) exogenous factors associated with broad-scale spatial trends in underlying environmental conditions, and (2) endogenous factors caused by local-scale pro”