Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications.
By R. Basson, J. Berman, A. Burnett, L. Derogatis, David M. Ferguson, J. Fourcroy, I. Goldstein, A. Graziottin, J. Heiman, E. Laan and 9 more. Journal of Urology, 2000
1,264 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Psychiatry and Mental health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d79f1f9005689f84ef11c744109ce11cf22f6c95
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Citations in the corpus
- The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017, methodology): “In one study, a literature review was undertaken and critiqued by experts [61], whereas in another study, a modified Delphi method was used to develop consensus definitions and classifications [62].”
- An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction (2010, background): “(ii) Superficial (introital) dyspareunia: complaint of pain or discomfort on vaginal entry or at the vaginal introitus (iii) Deep dyspareunia: complaint of pain or discomfort on deeper penetration (mid or upper vagina) (iv) Obstructed intercourse: complaint that vaginal penetration is not possible d”
- Distress About Sex: A National Survey of Women in Heterosexual Relationships (2003, background): “However, this was rejected on the grounds that ”complaints of this type are difficult to incorporate within the existing nosological framework” (Basson et al., 2000).”