Locally conservative, stabilized finite element methods for variably saturated flow

By C. Kees, Matthew W. Farthing, Clint N. Dawson. 2008

59 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d79b2056edff0712a0cb0be11ee3df1a51812801

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

1. Fred L. Ogden
2. Claudio Paniconi
3. Mario Putti
4. Matthew W. Farthing

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. Fred L. Ogden
2. Claudio Paniconi
3. Mario Putti
4. Matthew W. Farthing

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Fred L. Ogden
2. Claudio Paniconi
3. Mario Putti
4. Matthew W. Farthing

Citations in the corpus

• Numerical Solution of Richards' Equation: A Review of Advances and Challenges (2017, methodology): “We note that post-processing is increasingly being used in conjunction with continuous Galerkin methods to provide velocity fields that are locally conservative over elemental control volumes (Larson and Niklasson, 2004; Sun and Wheeler, 2006; Kees et al., 2008; Scudeler et al., 2016).”
• Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook (2015, methodology): “…analytic element, and cellular automata methods [Narasimhan and Witherspoon, 1976; Strack, 1976; Putti et al., 1990; Beckie et al., 1993; Eymard et al., 1999; Manzini and Ferraris, 2004; Mendicino et al., 2006; Kees et al., 2008; Putti and Sartoretto, 2009; An et al., 2010; Mazzia et al., 2011].”