Formalizing cardinality-based feature models and their specialization

By Krzysztof Czarnecki, Simon Helsen, Ulrich W. Eisenecker. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 2005

707 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Software

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d785539b2a294f7d87336bacbd60a78e1484061c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Information Systems

In Software

Citations in the corpus

Verifying feature-based model templates against well-formedness OCL constraints (2006, methodology): “Figure 1(a) shows a feature model in the cardinality-based feature modeling notation [4].”
Feature Models, Grammars, and Propositional Formulas (2005, neutral): “More elaborate cardinalities are possible [11].”
Reasoning about edits to feature models (2009, background): “, with attributes whose values are defined by configurations and not by the feature model itself [13].”
Automated analysis of feature models 20 years later: A literature review (2010, background): “Some authors propose extending FODA feature models with UML-like multiplicities (so-calledcardinalities) [28, 65].”
Generic semantics of feature diagrams (2007, methodology): “Work supported by Walloon Region and FSE under FIRST Europe Objective 3 Project PLENTY EPH3310300R0462 / 215315 Preprint submitted to Elsevier Science 4 May 2006”
Feature Diagrams and Logics: There and Back Again (2007, background): “Feature modeling is a family of notations and an approach for modeling commonality and variability in product families [15, 11, 4].”
Cool features and tough decisions: a comparison of variability modeling approaches (2012, background): “Notable extensions include group cardinalities [55], feature cardinalities [25], and feature inheritance [5].”
An Overview of Feature-Oriented Software Development (2009, background): “A major line of research aimed at enriching feature models with additional information, e.g., regarding feature cardinalities [ 48 ], propositional constraints [24], and non-functional properties of features [113].”
Mapping features to models: a template approach based on superimposed variants (2005, methodology): “Semantically, a feature model describes a set of all possible valid configurations [7].”
Staged configuration through specialization and multilevel configuration of feature models (2005, background): “The precise definition of each step is given elsewhere (Czarnecki et al., 2005).”