Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux

By W. Richardson, Eric A. Strauss, L. Bartsch, E. Monroe, Jennifer C. Cavanaugh, Lorrine Vingum, D. Søballe. 2004

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7815d76e70c2f362f18a0ab4bbf4f9d38d5d2b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. L. Johnson
2. W. Dodds
3. J. Tank
4. Melody J. Bernot
5. R. Hall
6. D. Sobota

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. W. Dodds
2. L. Johnson
3. J. Tank
4. Melody J. Bernot
5. J. O’Brien
6. R. Hall
7. William H. McDowell

Citations in the corpus

• Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. (2007, background): “Maintaining buffers around stream headwaters (Peterson et al., 2001; Richardson et al., 2004; Bernhardt et al., 2005a; Bernot and Dodds, 2005) will likely be most effective at maintaining overall watershed water quality while restoring degraded riparian zones, and stream channels may improve nitroge”
• Nitrous oxide emission from denitrification in stream and river networks (2010, background): “Several studies have shown that nitrification rates can be equal to or greater than denitrification rates in streams (26–28) and rivers (29), and the IPCC assumes nitrification rates exceed denitrification by twofold (30).”