PathNet: a tool for pathway analysis using topological information

By Bhaskar Dutta, Anders Wallqvist, Jaques Reifman. Source Code for Biology and Medicine, 2012

585 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundIdentification of canonical pathways through enrichment of differentially expressed genes in a given pathway is a widely used method for interpreting gene lists generated from high-throughput experimental studies. However, most algorithms treat pathways as sets of genes, disregarding any inter- and intra-pathway connectivity information, and do not provide insights beyond identifying lists of pathways.ResultsWe developed an algorithm (PathNet) that utilizes the connectivity information in canonical pathway descriptions to help identify study-relevant pathways and characterize non-obvious dependencies and connections among pathways using gene expression data. PathNet considers both the differential expression of genes and their pathway neighbors to strengthen the evidence that a pathway is implicated in the biological conditions characterizing the experiment. As an adjunct to this analysis, PathNet uses the connectivity of the differentially expressed genes among all pathways to score pathway contextual associations and statistically identify biological relations among pathways. In this study, we used PathNet to identify biologically relevant results in two Alzheimer’s disease microarray datasets, and compared its performance with existing methods. Importantly, PathNet identified de-regulation of the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis pathway as an important component in Alzheimer’s disease progression, despite the absence of this pathway in the standard enrichment analyses.ConclusionsPathNet is a novel method for identifying enrichment and association between canonical pathways in the context of gene expression data. It takes into account topological information present in pathways to reveal biological information. PathNet is available as an R workspace image fromhttp://www.bhsai.org/downloads/pathnet/.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d770c8fd2c1cc2e76c4d8350f252e0107a1dc5b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Barbara M. Terhal
  2. Peter Zoller
  3. Sergey Bravyi
  4. M. B. Hastings
  5. Spyridon Michalakis
  6. S. Diehl
  7. Rainer Blatt
  8. Markus P. Müller

In Molecular Biology

  1. Nicolas Delfosse
  2. Sergey Bravyi
  3. M. B. Hastings
  4. Naomi H. Nickerson
  5. Spyridon Michalakis
  6. H. Bombin
  7. Miguel Angel Martin-Delgado

Citations in the corpus