Local developmental state and order in China's urban development during transition
By Jieming Zhu. 2004
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7663ac45fdeadf85ef19f69f9ba2c987ee0f9ca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Urban Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Decoding Urban Land Governance: State Reconstruction in Contemporary Chinese Cities (2009, background): “Zhu (2004) describes a local state that is so ‘developmental’ in nature that its pro-growth position undermines the capacity to exercise effective development control.”
- Residential Redevelopment and the Entrepreneurial Local State: The Implications of Beijing’s Shifting Emphasis on Urban Redevelopment Policies (2009, background): “characterised China’s local state-led development as local state corporatism (Oi, 1995), state entrepreneurialism (Duckett, 1998) and local developmental statism (Zhu, 2004b), all focusing on the entrepreneurial nature of local state activities geared towards local economic growth.”
- The effects of the high-speed railway on urban development: International experience and potential implications for China (2015, background): “China’s city governments manage their local development and see themselves as competing with other localities to ensure local prosperity (Zhu, 2004).”
- Economic transition, spatial development and urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta, China (2017, background): “First, the land market has both social and economic importance for individual initiatives and consequent competition (Zhu, 2004a).”
- Restructuring for growth in urban China: Transitional institutions, urban development, and spatial transformation (2012, background): “States have been increasingly developmental and entrepreneurial, are even more active in policy initiatives since the 1990s, and can be described as corporate states (Walder, 1995), development states (Zhu, 2004), and entrepreneurial states (Wu & Phelps, 2011).”