Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows—Case study for housing in The Netherlands
By D. Müller. 2006
520 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d742683694c3ee580da83d3710ec7a465da7026a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Environmental Engineering
- F. Krausmann
- H. Haberl
- K. Erb
- Dominik Wiedenhofer
- S. Pauliuk
- Christoph Görg
- D. Müller
- Marina Fischer‐Kowalski
Citations in the corpus
- Material stocks in Germany's non-domestic buildings: a new quantification method (2016, unknown): “Top-down approaches (e.g., Fishman, Schandl, Tanikawa, Walker, & Krausmann, 2014; Kartam, Al-Mutairi, Al-Ghusain, & AlHumoud, 2004; Müller, 2006) provide almost no classification by type of materials and are unable to distinguish between different forms of building stock such as domestic and…”
- The Material Stock–Flow–Service Nexus: A New Approach for Tackling the Decoupling Conundrum (2017, background): “l pion ering work already highlighted the importance of the specific services manded b s ciety, for example m2 of living space, as the driver of building stock ccumulation and subsequent material flows [29,30].”
- The Role of In-Use Stocks in the Social Metabolism and in Climate Change Mitigation (2013, methodology): “We chose to extend the framework of cohort-lifetimebased dynamic material flow analysis (Baccini and Bader, 1996; Müller, 2006) to assess the direct and indirect resource demand and emissions associated with building up, maintaining, disposing of, and recycling in-use stocks (Pauliuk, 2013).”