Testing the correlation of word error rate and perplexity
By Dietrich Klakow, J. Peters. 2002
278 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Speech & Audio
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Mohit Bansal
- Jianfeng Gao
- Yoshua Bengio
- Graham Neubig
- Percy Liang
- Yejin Choi
- Kristen Grauman
- Kyunghyun Cho
In Speech & Audio
- Shinji Watanabe
- Jinyu Li
- Tara N. Sainath
- Takaaki Hori
- Rohit Prabhavalkar
- Ralf Schlüter
- Kristen Grauman
- Christian Fuegen
Citations in the corpus
- Racial disparities in automated speech recognition (2020, methodology): “We assess the performance of the ASR systems in terms of the word error rate (WER) (27), a standard measure of discrepancy between machine and human transcriptions.”
- Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Video (2021, methodology): “We adopt the well studied diarization error rate (DER) [11] and word error rate (WER) [114] for di-arization and transcription, respectively.”
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT (2019, background): “PER (Tillmann et al., 1997), WER (Klakow and Peters, 2002), CDER (Leusch et al., 2006), TER (Snover et al., 2006), and TER P (Snover et al., 2009) are metrics based on edit distance.”
- Offline recognition of unconstrained handwritten texts using HMMs and statistical language models (2004, background): “Unfortunately, the relationship between the PP of an SLM and the recognition rate of the system using it cannot be modeled clearly [27].”
- Polyglot Neural Language Models: A Case Study in Cross-Lingual Phonetic Representation Learning (2016, background): “Perplexity is the standard evaluation measure for language models, which has been shown to correlate strongly with error rates in downstream applications (Klakow and Peters, 2002).”
- On Smoothing and Inference for Topic Models (2009, background): “While perplexity is a somewhat indirect measure of predictive performance, it is nonetheless a useful characterization of the predictive qu ality of a language model and has been shown to be wellcorrelated with other measures of performance such worderror rate in speech recognition [Klakow and Peter”
- End-to-End Speech Recognition: A Survey (2023, background): “Also, the language model training objective, i.e. language model perplexity, is observed to correlate well with word error rate [311], [312], [313], [314].”
- EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models (2023, methodology): “Then, we calculate Word Error Rate (WER) [30], Normalized Edit Distance (NED) [51], Character Error Rate (CER) [38], and finally we average these three score to get the OCR-Score.”
- D3TW: Discriminative Differentiable Dynamic Time Warping for Weakly Supervised Action Alignment and Segmentation (2019, methodology): “The second is unit accuracy, which is metric similar to the word error rate in speech recognition [19].”