Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor)
By H. Gerhardt, Steven D. Tanner, C. Corrigan, H.C. Walton. 2000
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7240ac23173a9a0da7d28453a315bfbcc428804
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Mate choice rules in animals (2006, methodology): “These studies either use no-choice trials or compare female responsiveness to test stimuli in binary trials with a single reference stimulus (e.g. Ritchie 1996; Basolo 1998; Gerhardt et al. 2000; Shaw & Herlihy 2000).”
- Recognition and Localization of Acoustic Signals (2007, background): “However, these functions are usually not linear and open-ended: as values are increased even more, the effectiveness of the stimulus levels off or decreases (e.g., Gerhardt et al. 1996, 2000; Beckers and Schul 2004; Fig.”
- The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication (2007, background): “Females also exhibit strong discrimination against very short calls (Gerhardt et al. 2000b; Schwartz et al. 2001), and they prefer long calls delivered at a low rate to short calls delivered at a high rate.”
- Androgen-dependent male vocal performance influences female preference in Neotropical singing mice (2011, unknown): “We speculate that trill duration may not be as informative as other measures because female birds and frogs tend to prefer longer vocalizations (not shorter ones, as found herein; e.g. Clayton & Prove 1989; Ryan & Keddy-Hector 1992; Neubauer 1999; Gerhardt et al. 2000).”