Explicit schemes for dam-break simulations

By Christopher Zoppou, S. Roberts. 2003

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d71ed14261e328d053c283aca8c7128168de14f6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Sam S. Y. Wang
2. Xinya Ying
3. Eleuterio F. Toro
4. Pilar García-Navarro
5. Luke Smith
6. Qiuhua Liang
7. Michael Dumbser

In Computational Mechanics

1. Pilar García-Navarro
2. Sam S. Y. Wang
3. Xinya Ying
4. Eleuterio F. Toro
5. Luke Smith
6. Qiuhua Liang
7. Michael Dumbser
8. Vladimir A. Titarev

Citations in the corpus

• Towards a generalised GPU/CPU shallow-flow modelling tool (2013, methodology): “…HLLC (i.e. Harten, Lax, van Leer, contact-restoration) solver Toro et al. (1994) is used for approximate Riemann solutions, with less computational burden than an exact solution but an appropriate degree of accuracy for most shallow flow simulations Erduran et al. (2002); Zoppou and Roberts (2003).”
• Improved implementation of the HLL approximate Riemann solver for one-dimensional open channel flows (2008, methodology): “This is an ideal dam-break example and has been widely used for testing numerical schemes (e.g., Zoppou and Roberts, 2003; Ying et al., 2004).”
• Godunov-type methods for free-surface shallow flows: A review (2007, background): “The Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), see for example Monagham (1982), has also been applied to shallow water type flows, see for example the work of Zoppou and Roberts (2003) and that of Colagrossi and Landrinni (2003).”