The Economics of Nature: Managing Biological Assets
By G. C. Kooten, Erwin H. Bulte. 2000
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d711206ef679fb295f1cff81007ce3ac97c30a3b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Simon Dietz
- Lars Hein
- Eric Neumayer
- Erwin H. Bulte
- R. Greene
- Rodolphe Devillers
- G. C. Kooten
- Joan E. Luther
Citations in the corpus
- The Economic Value of the Pollination Service, a Review Across Scales (2009, background): “For public goods or services and private goods not traded in the market, a range of alternative valuation approaches have been developed, including revealed and stated preference methods (see e.g. Pearce and Moran 1994; OECD 1995; Van Kooten and Bulte 2000).”
- Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: concepts and measurement (2007, background): “Other criticisms of the EF have been made by Ayres (2000), IVM (2002), Neumayer (2003), van den Bergh and Verbruggen (1999) and van Kooten and Bulte (2000).”
- How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks (2004, unknown): “86 Stuart and Moura-Costa (1998) 2 1.97 1.97 Swisher (1991) 28 10.76 6.68 TERI (1997) 27 15.24 6.16 Totten (1999) 12 4.53 3.53 van Kooten and Bulte (2000)c 30 741.52 468.71 van Kooten and Hauer (2001) 29 81.18 28.06 van Kooten et al. (1992) 24 60.09 33.40 van Kooten et al. (1999, 2000) 120 36.17…”
- GIS-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis (2011, background): “There is substantial literature on economic valuation of non-monetary phenomenon, such as ecosystem goods and services (van Kooten and Bulte 2000; Turner et al. 2008).”
- The ecological footprint: useful science or politics? (2000, background): “The EF originates with an ecological view of sustainability that is both neo–Malthusian and anti monetary valuation (Rees and Wackernagel 1998; see also van Kooten and Bulte 2000, Chapter 8).”