Compositionality and Generalization In Emergent Languages
By Rahma Chaabouni, Evgeny Kharitonov, Diane Bouchacourt, Emmanuel Dupoux, Marco Baroni. 2020
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Natural language allows us to refer to novel composite concepts by combining expressions denoting their parts according to systematic rules, a property known as compositionality. In this paper, we study whether the language emerging in deep multi-agent simulations possesses a similar ability to refer to novel primitive combinations, and whether it accomplishes this feat by strategies akin to human-language compositionality. Equipped with new ways to measure compositionality in emergent languages inspired by disentanglement in representation learning, we establish three main results: First, given sufficiently large input spaces, the emergent language will naturally develop the ability to refer to novel composite concepts. Second, there is no correlation between the degree of compositionality of an emergent language and its ability to generalize. Third, while compositionality is not necessary for generalization, it provides an advantage in terms of language transmission: The more compositional a language is, the more easily it will be picked up by new learners, even when the latter differ in architecture from the original agents. We conclude that compositionality does not arise from simple generalization pressure, but if an emergent language does chance upon it, it will be more likely to survive and thrive.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cultural Studies, Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Yejin Choi
- Mohit Bansal
- Percy Liang
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Jacob Andreas
- Jianfeng Gao
- Graham Neubig
- Yoshua Bengio
In Cultural Studies
- Noah D. Goodman
- Jesse Mu
- Jacob Andreas
- Yonatan Bisk
- Ari Holtzman
- Yucheng Lu
- Mirella Lapata
- Yoshua Bengio
In Natural Language Processing
- Mohit Bansal
- Yejin Choi
- Jacob Andreas
- Richard Socher
- Graham Neubig
- Mirella Lapata
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Christopher D. Manning
Citations in the corpus
- Experience Grounds Language (2020, background): “testbed for studying language (Werner and Dyer, 1991) and emergent communication (Schlangen, 2019a; Lazaridou et al., 2018; Chaabouni et al., 2020).”
- A survey of multi-agent deep reinforcement learning with communication (2022, unknown): “The receiver agent must then either identify the correct goal based on the sender’s signaling [52, 53, 54, 47, 55, 56, 57, 58] or accomplish its single-agent task using the received signals (messages) [59, 60].”
- Iterated learning for emergent systematicity in VQA (2021, background): “Several works in the literature have found that compositionality only arises in emergent languages if appropriate environmental pressures are present (Kottur et al., 2017; Choi et al., 2018; Lazaridou et al., 2018; Chaabouni et al., 2020).”
- Emergent Communication of Generalizations (2021, background): “The ability to communicate accurately, even on unseen concepts, is not necessarily indicative of more systematic communication; generalization without compositional language is a common finding in the literature [1, 6, 16, 22].”