Rigorous limits on the interaction strength in quantum field theory
By Francesco Caracciolo, S. Rychkov. 2009
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We derive model-independent, universal upper bounds on the operator product expansion coefficients in unitary 4-dimensional conformal field theories. The method uses the conformal block decomposition and the crossing symmetry constraint of the 4-point function. In particular, the operator product expansion coefficient of three identical dimension d scalar primaries is found to be bounded by {approx_equal}10(d-1) for 1<d<1.7. This puts strong limits on unparticle self-interaction cross sections at the LHC.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6f463ac2950071188a0112e851e3415ae2ad38c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- David Simmons-Duffin
- S. Rychkov
- David Poland
- A. Fitzpatrick
- Jared Kaplan
- A. Vichi
- L. Rastelli
- B. C. Rees
Citations in the corpus
- Carving out OPE space and precise O(2) model critical exponents (2019, result): “Other analysis can also be found in [75–81].”
- Solving the 3d Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap II. $$c$$c-Minimization and Precise Critical Exponents (2012, background): “This important know-how was developed in a series of recent papers [16–23].”
- Emergent spacetime and holographic CFTs (2011, methodology): “See [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73] for recent work were the unitarity of the CFT in d > 2 was used to derive certain constraints for the data ∆i, Cijk, in special cases.”
- Bootstrapping the O(N ) vector models (2013, background): “Our primary goal, following previous numerical studies of the bootstrap [3–15], will be to place general upper bounds on the scaling dimensions of the first nontrivial scalar operators (both O(N) singlets S and O(N) symmetric tensors Tij) in the φi × φj operator product expansion (OPE).”
- A universal inequality for CFT and quantum gravity (2009, unknown): “(Also see [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22].)”
- Bounds on 4D conformal and superconformal field theories (2010, background): “In [35] bounds were also derived on the size of the three-point function coefficients of scalar operators appearing in φ × φ.”
- Exact correlators of BPS Operators from the 3d superconformal bootstrap (2014, background): “In most examples, crossing symmetry is combined with unitarity and is implemented numerically on various four-point functions (see, for example, [12–43]).”
- Bounds in 4D conformal field theories with global symmetry (2010, methodology): “These studies are made possible by the existence of O(1) universal bounds on the coefficients p ,l in the conformal block decomposition [3], and that the coefficients p4,2 and p3,1 can be related to the inverse central charges by the Ward identities [11].”
- Effective conformal theory and the flat-space limit of AdS (2010, background): “When this happens, the description of the CFT must be modified to maintain unitarity, and if this is to occur before the n where perturbation theory fails then one must (8)We note that the above bound is not as general as those derived in [25, 26, 27], which are valid also when both n and N are smal”
- The ϵ ?> -expansion from conformal field theory (2015, methodology): “The conformal bootstrap—using conformal symmetry to constrain the dynamics of various physically interesting critical theories—is an old idea [1–3] which in the last few years has been shown to be much more powerful than previously thought [4–11].”
- Improved bounds for CFT’s with global symmetries (2011, methodology): “In order to constrain the size of the OPE coefficients p∆,l, we proceed as in [9].”
- Modular bootstrap revisited (2016, background): “The degeneracy d∆,s of a primary of dimension ∆ and spin s is then subject to the following upper bound (this mirrors the upper bound on the squared OPE coefficients derived in the context of the four-point function bootstrap in [24])”
- Spinning conformal correlators (2011, methodology): “The efficiency of this method has been demonstrated in several recent applications [3–11].”
- Spinning conformal blocks (2011, background): “In [3–10] it was for example demonstrated that crossing symmetry of four point functions of scalars combined with unitarity leads to completely general bounds on CFT operator dimensions and OPE coefficients.”
- Bootstrapping the 3d Ising twist defect (2013, methodology): “More recently, interesting constraints on the Ising model [2] and other CFTs have been derived using the methods of the conformal bootstrap [3–21].”
- The bootstrap program for boundary CFTd (2012, methodology): “This approach has been refined and extended in a series of papers [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13].”
- A semidefinite program solver for the conformal bootstrap (2015, methodology): “This modern incarnation of the conformal bootstrap [10, 11] has been applied to numerous theories, and the list is growing [12–33].”