Wideband Radar Cross Section Reduction of Slot Antennas Arrays
By Simone Genovesi, Filippo Costa, Agostino Monorchio. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2014
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6f131b0656bb6a722367c7e2815e200bacc2c69
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- A Circularly Polarized High-Gain Antenna With Low RCS Over a Wideband Using Chessboard Polarization Conversion Metasurfaces (2017, methodology): “In [9], periodic resistive elements are used to improve the RCS features and metallic parasitic elements are used to enhance antenna radiation performance.”
- Design of Absorptive/Transmissive Frequency-Selective Surface Based on Parallel Resonance (2017, background): “The bandpass frequency-selective surface (FSS) is often applied in hybrid radomes [1] as a frequencyselective filter which transmits operating waves while reflecting the out-of-band waves; this prevents interference and reduces the radar cross section (RCS) [2]–[5].”
- An Overview of Equivalent Circuit Modeling Techniques of Frequency Selective Surfaces and Metasurfaces (2014, background): “Nowadays, FSSs [19], [20] are employed at microwave frequencies for designing frequency selective radomes [21], leaky wave/Fabry-Perot, low-profile and low-RCS antennas [22]-[24], reflectarays, trasmittarrays and lenses [25], [26], polarization converting surfaces [27], waveguide filters [28], elect”
- Realization of Low Scattering for a High-Gain Fabry–Perot Antenna Using Coding Metasurface (2017, methodology): “In [27] and [28], the FSS structures were employed for the RCS reduction with well-maintained radiation performance.”
- Wideband RCS Reduction of a Slot Array Antenna Using Polarization Conversion Metasurfaces (2016, methodology): “The thickness of the FR4 slab is 3 mm, which is much thinner than the back cavity of the antenna in [7].”