Random models versus periodic models for fibre reinforced composites

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Micro-mechanical analysis of the in situ effect in polymer composite laminates (2014, background): “[57] compared the stress and strain distributions between a periodic and a random model for a carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP), established in Ref.”
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF REAL AND SIMULATED FIBRE ARRANGEMENTS IN UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITES (2013, background): “Effects of the non-uniform fibre distribution on the composite overall behaviour have been extensively studied in the literature [1-7].”
Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm (2005, unknown): “Various means of simplifying the complex spectra arising from such solutes have been developed.”
A combined experimental–numerical approach for generating statistically equivalent fibre distributions for high strength laminated composite materials (2010, background): “[3] compared the stress and strain distributions resulting from a transverse tensile load applied to both a random model and a periodic model of a carbon fibre composite.”