Numerical diffusive terms in weakly-compressible SPH schemes

By Matteo Antuono, Andrea Colagrossi, Salvatore Marrone. Computer Physics Communications, 2012

460 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6d8075464bfc6f42ac0e70a30fc91e3a209db9a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

1. Abbas Khayyer
2. Hitoshi Gotoh
3. Antonio Souto-Iglesias
4. Tarek I. Zohdi
5. M. A. Russell
6. Seiichi Koshizuka
7. T. Tamai
8. Yuma Shimizu

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Abbas Khayyer
2. Hitoshi Gotoh
3. Antonio Souto-Iglesias
4. Tarek I. Zohdi
5. M. A. Russell
6. Peter Wriggers
7. T. Tamai
8. Seiichi Koshizuka

Citations in the corpus

• Current achievements and future perspectives for projection-based particle methods with applications in ocean engineering (2016, methodology): “In the context of weakly compressible SPH, the so-called delta-SPH (Antuono et al. 2012) as well as Riemann SPH (Inutsuka 1994, 2002; Monaghan 1997; Gao et al. 2012; Rafiee et al. 2012) schemes have been proposed to enhance the accuracy, especially in terms of reproduced pressure field.”
• Numerical simulation of Laser Fusion Additive Manufacturing processes using the SPH method (2018, background): “The δ-SPH framework smooths out localized spatial fluctuations in the density/pressure fields that are often apparent in SPH simulations of violent free-surface flows and can lead to inaccurate results [16,20].”